On 9 August 2012 14:37, dan (ddp) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Normal rollovers work just fine. It's when people do absolutely > strange things with these logs (like creating a separate logfile for > every event or include random information in the logfile name) that > there are problems. >
Colour me stupid (you wouldn't be the first) but what do you mean by 'normal rollover'? Do you mean that so long as the new log file has the same name as then rolled-over log file so, for example: foobar.log gets rolled over to: foobar1.log and new events are written to: foobar.log? Or do you mean (like with the Apache logs): foobar20120702.log, foobar20120703.log, foobar20120704.log, ...? Regards, Nick
