On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Nick Davies <[email protected]> wrote: > On 9 August 2012 14:37, dan (ddp) <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Normal rollovers work just fine. It's when people do absolutely >> strange things with these logs (like creating a separate logfile for >> every event or include random information in the logfile name) that >> there are problems. >> > > Colour me stupid (you wouldn't be the first) but what do you mean by > 'normal rollover'? Do you mean that so long as the new log file has > the same name as then rolled-over log file so, for example: > > foobar.log > > gets rolled over to: > > foobar1.log > > and new events are written to: > > foobar.log?
This. ^ > > Or do you mean (like with the Apache logs): > > foobar20120702.log, > foobar20120703.log, > foobar20120704.log, ...? > > Regards, > > Nick But this should work too.
