If I build another waveform on desktop OSSIE and want to run on my board 
whether I've to again build complete file system using console-image or 
bitbaking of only new waveform related files will work? Actually my board 
doesn't have support for  any sound out device and I can't check fm-from-file 
waveform  therefore I want to build another waveform which print output on 
console. will ossie lab 1 work fine?
Saleh
> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 10:37:04 -0400
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: embedded ossie dm6446
> 
> On 04/01/2010 10:33 AM, saleh usman wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> > console-image has been built successfully and /sdr directory is present in 
> > file system image.But as mentioned on page http://www.opensdr.com/node/11 
> > file /etc/pulse/daemon.conf is not there.
> 
> OK, you are now the first person to try this on the dm6446! 
> Unfortunately, the only hw I can test on is the beagleboard. I'll try 
> and test my build on it and see if I can see where that file went.
> 
> Thanks for your patience.
> 
> > Also I've board on which linux is already runing so if I replace the 
> > already flashed file system  with OE generated will it work or I has to 
> > replace old kernel with OE generated kernel?
> 
> As long as you put any modules for your kernel in the rootfs, your 
> existing kernel should be fine.
> 
> Philip
> 
> 
> >
> > Saleh
> >
> >
> >> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:43:24 -0400
> >> From: [email protected]
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: embedded ossie dm6446
> >>
> >> On 03/29/2010 10:31 AM, saleh usman wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 08:14:21 -0400
> >>>> From: [email protected]
> >>>> To: [email protected]
> >>>> Subject: Re: Boost library issue
> >>>>
> >>>> On 03/28/2010 08:03 AM, saleh usman wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm proceeding now by manually changing      
> >>>>> AC_CHECK_LIB([boost_filesystem], [main], [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([cannot find 
> >>>>> boost_filesystem library.])]).
> >>>>
> >>>> Two things: Do not build ossie-image. Follow the instructions from the
> >>>> article at:
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.opensdr.com/node/7
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I am bitbaking console-image now by following this page but when I 
> >>> bitbake conosle-image after adding following lines nothing builds more 
> >>> than the first bitbake of console-image.
> >>>
> >>> NGSTROM_EXTRA_INSTALL = " screen oprofile ossie-fm-from-file "
> >>> require /sdr/ossie_collection/conf/distro/include/sane-ossie-revs.inc
> >>>
> >>> BBFILES = "/sdr/openembedded/recipes/*/*.bb 
> >>> /sdr/ossie_collection/packages/*/*.bb"
> >>>
> >>> BBFILE_COLLECTIONS = "upstream ossie"
> >>>
> >>> BBFILE_PATTERN_upstream = "^/sdr/openembedded/recipes"
> >>> BBFILE_PRIORITY_upstream = "5"
> >>>
> >>> BBFILE_PATTERN_ossie = "^/sdr/ossie_collection/packages"
> >>> BBFILE_PRIORITY_ossie = "10"
> >>>
> >>> Terminal log follows which is same as the output of the console-image 
> >>> without adding above lines.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [sa...@localhost ~]$ bitbake console-image
> >>> NOTE: Handling BitBake files: \ (8169/8169) [100 %]
> >>> NOTE: Parsing finished. 7504 cached, 335 parsed, 330 skipped, 0 masked.
> >>> NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
> >>> NOTE: Preparing runqueue
> >>> NOTE: Executing runqueue
> >>> NOTE: Running task 3000 of 3005 (ID: 18, 
> >>> /sdr/openembedded/recipes/images/console-image.bb, 
> >>> do_package_update_index_ipk)
> >>> NOTE: Running task 3004 of 3005 (ID: 10, 
> >>> /sdr/openembedded/recipes/images/console-image.bb, do_rootfs)
> >>> NOTE: Running task 3005 of 3005 (ID: 4, 
> >>> /sdr/openembedded/recipes/images/console-image.bb, do_build)
> >>> NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 3005 tasks of which 3002 didn't need to be 
> >>> rerun and 0 failed.
> >>
> >> Do a "bitbake -c clean task-base" then build console-image. (Actually, I
> >> think bitbake -c clean console-image is enough, but my fingers are
> >> trained to clean task-base. When you change the ANGSTROM_EXTRA_INSTALL
> >> var, bitbake does not have a way of seeing the change, so you have to
> >> help it some.)
> >>
> >> Philip
> >                                     
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
> > https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
> 
                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969

Reply via email to