Yes, agreed. I completely agree with you.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 7:51 AM Nadav Har'El <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 1:50 PM Jose Mathew Manimala < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello Nadav, >> >> >> >> Good day to you. >> >> The fundamental difference is that RHEL and Centos are Long Term Support >> versions and usually run on a LTS build of yum. >> >> On recent builds of Fedora based distributions, dnf the new package >> manager is the norm. >> >> >> >> yum swap A B is the equivalent in the new world dnf install –allowearsing >> package. >> >> >> >> The same switch is also exposed through yum on newer releases(yum passes >> on calls to dnf). >> >> This is why fundamentally, RHEL and Centos package management will lag >> behind Fedora. >> >> >> >> My reasoning for overriding the install variable was >> >> 1. to provide a cleaner parameter list availability for RHEL and >> Centos, In case there are many incompatible flags in the future. >> 2. We could also, as you have suggested, refactor the individual >> versions, but I don’t have context to which versions of Fedora, >> >> So, as I noted, this flag was only needed for the > "compact-openssl10-devel" package, so it's only needed for the Fedora > versions which add this package. > In the future, it would be great if we could drop both this package, and > the flag. The reason for this package is explained in commit > af16f934ab795e607e3041dc707dbcd7ea4a7229. > > > -- Cheers, Jose -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OSv Development" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
