On May 23, 2008, at 8:06 AM, Patrick Coskren wrote: > So Jared, I bet I sounded pretty confident you'd get your mom's > twenty quid on Tuesday. Boy do I suck. I thought she'd have to > withdraw after Obama got over 50% of the pledged delegates, which he > did on Tuesday. There's literally no way she can win democratically > at this point; the superdelegates would have to break for her > something like 80-20, and they just won't. It's just incredible how > she's dragging this out anyway. Is it the fundraising? Sheer > narcissism? > > I still think she'll drop out after all the primaries are over > (June 6?), but damn, maybe she will bring it all the way to the > convention.
You do realize that you are talking about a woman who believed that her husband did not have an affair with Monica despite DNA evidence and the fact that she knew for a fact that he had been screwing around with other women since they met? But it was painful for her to believe the Monica affair so she didn't. Realism has always been a weak point with Hillary. I don't get all the pundits who argue that somehow Hillary must know that the race is over. Hillary has always shown a remarkable ability to believe what she wants to believe regardless of the evidence. Hillary believes that 'they' are trying to take away a shot at the presidency that is legitimately hers. --- Neither a man nor a crowd nor a nation can be trusted to act humanely or to think sanely under the influence of a great fear. -Bertrand Russell, philosopher, mathematician, author, Nobel laureate (1872-1970) _______________________________________________ OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected] http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters List hosted at http://cat5.org/
