On Jan 27, 2009, at 11:52 PM, David Cake wrote: > At 7:13 PM -0700 27/1/09, LuKreme wrote: >> On 27-Jan-2009, at 16:00, Chris Gehlker wrote: >>> The only question is how far up the chain of command this should be >>> pursued. That is more a question of policy than a question of fact. >> >> >> If you prosecute Rummy, don't you have to prosecute Pelosi and >> Clinton >> as well? And a Legion of others? > > Nope. One crime at a time, starting with a nice clear case > with a good level of evidence. They can get to the others later if > they have time. > Just because other people clearly committed the same crime, > doesn't mean you get to get out of your speeding ticket just because > all those other people weren't unlucky enough to drive past the cop > with the radar gun (or did it when he was busy writing you a ticket).
This is way too naive. If a democratic administration prosecutes republicans who are out of power while ignoring democrats who are still in power it will be seen for what it is, a political vendetta an a miscarriage of justice. - God must have loved the people in power, for he made them so much like their own image of him. -Kenneth Patchen _______________________________________________ OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected] http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters List hosted at http://cat5.org/
