Hello David: I really don't think OT is trying to become more specialized and that may be the problem. I think certain practitioners, however, are trying to specialize in UE (I'm NOT referring to CHT's) and this is also a problem.
If OT were to become more specialized, what is it that you think we should make our speciality? Ron ~~~~~~ On Friday, March 01, 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: D> Ron, D> is this something to do with the idea of the profession becoming more D> specialised at the cost of "general practice" (and therefore losing D> something fundamental)? D> here in Australia there has recently been debate about the need to perceive D> doctors in general practice as "specialists" in their own right....the D> argument in favour of this goes that they have a better/ongoing/more central D> role in the life of the person ie "patient" (than a mr./ms D> fix-that-part-of-you Specialist)..whereas the role of the GP is more D> collaborative and integrative.... D> David D> *********��*********** D> Unsubscribe? Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] D> In the message's *body*, put the following text: unsubscribe OTlist D> ** List messages are archived at: D> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] D> *********��*********** *********��*********** Unsubscribe? Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the message's *body*, put the following text: unsubscribe OTlist ** List messages are archived at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] *********��***********
