My comments are somewhat simplistic but there are a lot of possibilities that 
can come from them.  I think that comments such as these tend to further the 
separation between OT and PT rather than remember that we are part of a team.  
In our clinic, we treat the entire person and do not focus on which profession 
is doing what.  I know where my boundaries of training are and stay within 
those boundaries.  However, I do disagree with opportunities.  If you look at 
the opportunities for CEU, OT does delve into some of these areas that you feel 
are the separation between the professions.  It is up to the individual within 
the field to make sure that they are trained in areas of interest, not the 
profession's responsibility.
 
As for the research aspect of OT, I think what we OTs need to remember is that 
our areas are in areas that are less quantifiable.  It is easy to measure 
strength because those standards are out there.  But, how do you quantify the 
psychological benefits of regaining physical control of your body, as OT helps 
to facilitate??  It's not that simple, which makes it quite difficult for OTs 
to have that empirical evidence to support what we do.  I don't think this is a 
justifiable reason to say we don't or aren't trying to make the effort to bring 
our profession up to the "callibar" of PT...I just think it is a fundamental 
difference.  It is much like trying to compare psychological studies to the 
"true sciences".
 
Those are my opinions.  Quite frankly, I am very happy as an OT.  I am proud of 
what we do.  Most importantly, I utilize my working experiences with PTs to 
learn about areas that I do not have training.  I think we learn from everyone. 
 We shouldn't be jealous or resentful but rather understand that there will be 
differences in training....that is the way things work.
 
Tammy

Mara Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Ron and everyone
First, a short introduction -- I'm in my last year of OT school (Bachelors 
program, getting MEd though at the same time) in Cincinnati, OH; I've been 
lurking for awhile, and about a year ago, I posted a couple of things to the 
OT list. . .but school and time got away from me that I wasn't very faithful 
at visiting the website too often.

Anyway, Ron, I felt sad reading your rant :-(. I'm just wondering if you 
notice how your clients react to using occupation. Do they "get it?" What 
are some common benefits that your clients have commented about after you 
use occupation with them. Have they ever compared OT and PT. . . do they see 
the difference? Just curious. .. pretty loaded questions...just curious 
about everyone's thoughts.
Thanks!
Mara

>From: Ron Carson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: [OTlist] Long Rant about OT
>Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 23:20:20 -0500
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>What follow is a copy of my response to a message that was posted on
>an AOTA listserve about a marketing company claiming that PT's are
>experts in human function.
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>WARNING! LONG RANT WITH LOTS OF PERSONAL OPINION FOLLOWS - PROCEED WITH
>CAUTION....
>
>In my opinion, PT's are much more expert at human function (what ever
>that means) than OT's ever will be. Generally, PT's are better trained
>in human function than OT's because PT's receive training in more
>modalities and body areas than the vast majority of OTs. Some will say
>that PT's aren't trained in phsych-soc, but from my teaching 
experience
>that is no longer true! I think it's time for OT to realize our place
>compared to PT!
>
>PT' have clout, they have recognition and most importantly, they have
>ACCESS!!!! They have clout because they have tons of research supporting
>what they do! They have recognition because they have a bunch of PT's
>running around tooting their horns! They have access to home health
>(often times when OT doesn't), they have access to CORF's (where OT is
>NOT a required therapy) and I believe that they will soon have direct
>access to Medicare patients! In the field of medicine/rehab, PT's rule
>the roost!
>
>How did it get this way? What were AOTA, State organizations and
>individual practitioners doing during this past 100 years to let this
>happen? I don't know!
>
>Does it need to be this way? Nope!
>
>What can we do? I say that we focus on our expertise! What is that, you
>say? Our expertise is occupation! If you don't believe me, look at what
>AOTA say's in the new Framework!
>
>quote> Occupational therapists? and occupational therapy 
assistants?
>quote> expertise lies in their knowledge of occupation and how 
engaging
>quote> in occupations can be used to affect human performance and 
the
>quote> effects of disease and disability.
>
>But, almost no where else in the world, does anyone recognize the term
>occupation as it relates to the significance of doing daily 
human
>activity. We are experts in something that on the surface, doesn't seem
>to mean a whole lot to a whole lot of people. So, what do we do!
>
>I often feel that OT is stuck between a rock and hard place.... in my
>mind there is NO perfect solution. However, it does seem that right now,
>the OT profession is spinning lots of mud and getting nowhere fast!
>
>I am staunch believer in OT, but I am also a realist! I have a company
>called HOPE Therapy. HOPE = Health, Occupational Performance and
>Empowerment. I have the words "OT" and an OT logo emblazoned 
on my shirt
>sleeve and on my chest. Everyday, I go to see clients, I face the same
>battle. "So you're a PT". I use the COPM as frequently as I 
can; I talk
>about occupation and I try to practice occupation. I don't have
>equipment, I don't use cones, putty, thera-band, etc. But everyday, it's
>the same battle - trying to practice occupation in a non-occupational
>world! I just doesn't seem to fit!!! At least it doesn't seem to fit in
>the medical, third-party payment system!
>
>Well, this is the end to a long rant from the middle of nowhere!
>
>Ron C.
>
>
>
>===============<Original Message>===============
>
>On 3/7/2005, admin-sis Listmanager 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>asL> "[PT's] know they are the experts in human function".
>
>
>--
>Unsubscribe?
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Change options?
> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com
>
>Archive?
> www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>
>Help?
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
Unsubscribe?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Change options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com 

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Help?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Tammy Renaud, MA, OTR 
Jumpstart 
Animals helping kids with the job of living.
-- 
Unsubscribe?
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Change options?
  www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com 

Archive?
  www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Help?
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to