Hello Ron, my favorite rebel, I mean, OT.  And, I am trying to figure
out if this conversation is leading to a discussion about movement
science or is still dealing with the difference between OT and PT.

I think the OT/PT difference issue is a well discussed topic here and
elsewhere, but, to talk about movement science would be fun.

So, lets talk about kayaking and fishing.....I think they both have to
do with movement science.....some with automatic, lower brain center
controlled movement and some with conscious, voluntary, skilled
movement.

And, I wish I was doing both right now.  Caught anything lately?  Want
to take me fishing this summer when I come down?



David A. Lehman, PhD (in movement science :) , PT

Associate Professor

Tennessee State University

Department of Physical Therapy

3500 John A. Merritt Blvd.

Nashville, TN 37209

615-963-5946

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ron Carson
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 3:10 AM
To: susanne
Subject: Re: [OTlist] Disturbing Message, Please Respond

Hello Susanne:

I  guess  the  movement  science  folk are in stark disagreement with my
'primitive instinct' approach to movement, huh?

I  really  wonder,  are patients motivated by 'walking over to the lunch
table'  or  is  walking  itself  the  motivation. Let's do a compare and
contrast:

It's  4:06  in  the morning and I'm getting ready to go kayak fishing. I
have  a  couple  of  miles  to  kayak  before  reaching my spot, so what
motivates me to do this; is it the process of kayaking or the product of
fishing?

Now  that  I think about, this has nothing to do with the topic at hand,
so I'm going fishing! <LOL>

Ron

----- Original Message -----
From: susanne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006
To:   [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subj: [OTlist] Disturbing Message, Please Respond


s> "Movement science" is the answer I usually got when asking a PT why
we
s> suddenly seemed to think and act so alike:-) They now knew that to
best
s> initate movement the patient had to know: Movement towards what? Like
s> walking over to the lunch table.... I always felt this helped our
mutual
s> understanding and cooperation. I never felt they stole away much of
my
s> job though - like, say, dealing with the patient's problems with
eating,
s> having lunch in a social setting etc....

s> Just an example. In general - the (Movement Science oriented) PT will
s> want to know some of what might motivate this patient - in order to 
s> better plan treatment - to use meaningful goals (targets?) for the 
s> movement they work on. This does not mean they work on the full
scoope
s> of the patient's activity goals (wanted/needed occupations) like we
do.
s> It just sometimes looks the same from the outside - if you just see
the
s> trailer and not the whole movie...

s> susanne, denmark

s> ---- Original Message ----
s> From: "Ron Carson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
s> To: <[email protected]>
s> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 2:15 AM
s> Subject: [OTlist] Disturbing Message, Please Respond

>> Hello All:
>>
>> Recently,  I  received a 'disturbing' message from a fellow
>> therapist. I say 'disturbing' because I really don't know how to
>> respond. So, I asked the  person if I could post there message and
>> they agreed. The person is on  the  OTlist but I will leave it to
>> them to disclose who they are, if they wish.
>>
>> Please  take  a  minute  and  read  this  therapists message and
>> respond accordingly.  I  really  feel  this  person's  pain but I
>> don't have any advice off the top of my head. I think the message is
>> a good catalyst to open a much needed discussion.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ron
>>
>>      <<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Original Message Follows >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>> Hi  Ron  I  am  a  Cota of 10 years practice in LTC. I am in the work
>> of starting  the  bridge program at [ommited]this year for OTR
>> program. But for  the past few months I may be changing my mind. I
>> cannot help but to wonder  what makes OT and PT different from each
>> other. AS I do research on  scope  of  practice  in  each  field I
>> read terms of functional, ADL retraining  in self care in home,
>> community or work integration repeated over and over again. I find
>> these term in PT scope of practice. Goals as you  know  are  the
>> foundations of OT. ON many occasion as I work in the rehab  room I
>> look over in shock as the PT will perform mock kitchen act such as
>> cones in different areas, bathroom transfers. Which make it very hard
>> to  explain  to  the patient the purpose of certain act to achieve
>> function  when  PT  has  already  address  this. I am amazed of how
>> many doctors  will  order  PT for shoulder injuries. So I am trying
>> to figure out  what make OT different from PT. I wonder if years from
>> doctors will just  order  PT  service since the scope of practice are
>> pretty much the same.
>>
>>            <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< End of Message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 




-- 
Unsubscribe?
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Change options?
  www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com 

Archive?
  www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Help?
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
Unsubscribe?
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Change options?
  www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com 

Archive?
  www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Help?
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to