Gee, I remember being in school and getting the idea that "pathways" or 
"Logarithms" are basically  "Cookbook" therapy and we were being trained 
to be better than that.  I'm not sure I really agree with that 
assessment, this is just my fond memories of academia! :-)

Jim


Lehman, David wrote:

>I am glad to see the conversation change from who does/owns what between
>PT and OT :)
>
>I agree with mary that SLP should be responsible for dysphagia/aphasia,
>as far as the modern medical model goes.
>
>But, I also agree with Mary that if a person is specialized, trained, or
>has done research in a particular gray area, then that person should be
>responsible for that particular impairment/outcome.
>
>The cognitive realm is not owned, nor should be, by any professional
>designation.  If OT, PT, SLP, MD, nurse, etc.  are all cognitively
>present and aware of the clients cognition, it only enhances the
>treatment of all professions.  
>
>What urks me is that the government decision makers (i.e. the decider)
>is not cognitive about how our health care system could work better and
>more efficiently.
>
>I have a question for the listserve (somewhat along the same "cognitive"
>path).
>
>Is there discussion within the OT field about creating logarithms for
>treating clients? Making decision trees that take in account as many
>significant variables as possible?  This is happening in the treatment
>of neurological clients in PT.  It is interesting to me that one day we
>will get a client, plug in the information from our evaluation and POOF
>- do this for/to the client for best outcomes.  
>
>What might that lead to in regards to who owns/does what?
>
>David A. Lehman, PhD, PT
>
>Associate Professor
>
>Tennessee State University
>
>Department of Physical Therapy
>
>3500 John A. Merritt Blvd.
>
>Nashville, TN 37209
>
>615-963-5946
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>  
>


-- 
Unsubscribe?
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Change options?
  www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com 

Archive?
  www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Help?
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to