I mis-spoke, perhaps....meaning that there really are no unique variables that ONLY exist to one person on earth. If enough data is gathered on a population, the "unique" or should I say less appearing variables we call unique, would be detectable and the statistical model would show us what contribution that particular "unique variable" makes and if it is significant in the outcome. I guess my next question would be to ask the members to list variables they consider unique to a person that have an impact on the treatment they provide.
________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Ron Carson Sent: Wed 7/26/2006 4:04 PM To: Lehman, David Subject: Re: [OTlist] Interesting Stats I don't know much, if anything, about regression theory, but I'm pretty confident that it is impossible to take into account ALL the UNIQUE variables that account for healing. Also, it seems rather counterintuitive to try include a "unique" variable into a "general" logarithm. Ron ----- Original Message ----- From: Lehman, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subj: [OTlist] Interesting Stats LD> all of the unique variables of LD> a client could one day be analysed in a regression model and thus determine how much these LD> unique variables actually account for healing, then include them in the logaritm? -- Unsubscribe? [EMAIL PROTECTED] Change options? www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com Archive? www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] Help? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Unsubscribe? [EMAIL PROTECTED] Change options? www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com Archive? www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] Help? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
