Thanks Mary, I thought of that, but I don't write short term goals.

Ron
--
Ron Carson MHS, OT

----- Original Message -----
From: Mary Giarratano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008
To:   [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subj: [OTlist] Elbow Break, Referral...

MG> You could use the first goals as short term goals and the second goals as 
her
MG> long term goals.  Right now pain and ROM are her most pressing problems and
MG> later functional activities will be more appropriate.

MG> Mary

MG> -----Original Message-----
MG> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
MG> Ron Carson
MG> Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2008 3:49 PM
MG> To: OTlist
MG> Subject: [OTlist] Elbow Break, Referral...

MG> Received  a  new referral for a elbow fracture. I shouldn't have taken
MG> it but I did.

MG> And  here  is  the  dilemma  facing our profession. The patient is 95,
MG> previously living independently. Fractured elbow in a fall. Now living
MG> with  daughter.  She  is  in a large amount of pain. Obviously, she is
MG> dependent  for  most of her occupations. She currently uses a cane but
MG> is not safe.

MG> The  patient's  immediate concerns are her elbow. When pressed, she of
MG> course wants to go back home, but that is not an immediate goal.

MG> So what do I write for goals? For example should I write:

MG>         Patient will self-report pain as 3 out of 10

MG>         Patient's will increase active elbow extension to -20 degrees


MG> These  goals seem to direct the patients and doctor's concerns but are
MG> not occupationally oriented. So, should I write:


MG>         Patient will safely and independently dress lower body

MG>         Patient  will safely and independently ambulate to the bathroom
MG>         using the least restrictive mobility aid

MG> I like these goals but they don't address the immediate concerns.

MG> Ron
MG> -- 
MG> Ron Carson MHS, OT


MG> -- 
MG> Options?
MG> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

MG> Archive?
MG> www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
MG> No virus found in this incoming message.
MG> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
MG> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.14/1646 - Release Date: 9/1/2008 
6:03
MG> PM





-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to