Thibaut VARENE <vare...@debian.org> writes: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Greg Troxel <g...@ir.bbn.com> wrote: >> >> In pkgsrc, libotr is simply libotr. >> >> Two questions: >> >> will just libotr.pc be installed, but with the new versions? If so, I >> don't see any reason to call this libotr5, but rather just libotr. >> >> Is there any reason to have both the old version and the new version >> simultaneously packaged? It seems the only real user of libotr is >> pidgin-otr, and hopefully > > Not really, no: > apt-cache rdepends libotr2 > libotr2 > Reverse Depends: > python-otr-dbg > python-otr > psi-plus-plugins > pidgin-otr > mcabber > libotr2-dev > libotr2-bin > kopete > xchat-otr > irssi-plugin-otr > bitlbee-plugin-otr
ok, but do the current releases of all those build against libotr-4? If so, there is no issue in pkgsrc (even if they were all packaged, which they're not). If not, then there are bigger problems.
pgpDfE6tTM1IS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OTR-dev mailing list OTR-dev@lists.cypherpunks.ca http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/mailman/listinfo/otr-dev
