On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:33 AM, Ian Goldberg <i...@cypherpunks.ca> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 01:08:12AM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote: >> Quick silly question: >> >> should it be packaged as "libotr3", being protocol v3 (which was >> apparently in line with what was done for 3.x), or "libotr5", being >> sonumber 5 (which is what distros recommend)? > > libotr5, libotr5-bin, libotr5-dev. The previous package name was > libotr2, because the .so major number was 2.
hmm good point. Don't know where I got the impression it wasn't 2 before. Must have been on glue ;-P My bad. _______________________________________________ OTR-dev mailing list OTR-dev@lists.cypherpunks.ca http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/mailman/listinfo/otr-dev
