On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:01:02AM +0100, Hannes Mehnert wrote: > On 12/17/2014 18:22, Ian Goldberg wrote: > > Hmm. That certainly isn't the *intent*. I don't see in the spec > > where it allows fragments to be fragmented. Messages can be > > fragmented, but fragments aren't messages--they're fragments of > > messages. > > right. > > > Can you point to where the spec misled you or was unclear? I'd > > certainly like to fix that. > > Re-reading it turns out the spec is pretty clear, and talks about > 'messages, either fragmented or unfragmented', in the fragmentation > section about 'fragments'. > It wouldn't hurt too much to explicitly state 'messages can be > fragmented, fragments can't - they aren't messages' in the > fragmentation section.
Done, and pushed to git (devel branch). Thanks! - Ian _______________________________________________ OTR-dev mailing list OTR-dev@lists.cypherpunks.ca http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/mailman/listinfo/otr-dev
