Quoting Ian Goldberg (2018-05-08 21:15:00) > On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 02:48:12PM -0400, Jurre van Bergen wrote: > > I think once OTRv4 is out of the door, just like OTRv1, OTRv2 should be > > dropped. @ian? @nik? > > I'm in principle fine with dropping v2 support. I wouldn't mind a quick > look-around at what OTR implementations still don't support v3, though. > pidgin-otr does, of course. What about Adium? Others?
AFAIK this overview is up to date on the client implementation of OTR: https://github.com/otrv4/otrv4/wiki/Client-OTR-implementation-overview From it I see only potr not supporting OTRv3, which means weechat and gajim are lagging behind. -- meskio | http://meskio.net/ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- My contact info: http://meskio.net/crypto.txt -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Nos vamos a Croatan.
signature.asc
Description: signature
_______________________________________________ OTR-dev mailing list OTR-dev@lists.cypherpunks.ca http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/mailman/listinfo/otr-dev
