Hey, > Therefore I will use voice chat only when people insist on it > and try to avoid discussing sensitive topics. Man this sucks. Indeed. =( =( =(
> > I strongly disagree. No matter how skilled a developer is, a larger > > library means more internal complexity, something that has been shown > > increases the likelihood of bugs. I don't trust any developer, no > > matter how skilled, to not make mistakes. =) > > It doesn't necessarily increase complexity as more often than not > it's just a well-curated collection of primitives with a > common abstraction on top. I still understand what you're > saying and don't really disagree, but I don't consider > trusting 5 independent projects an improvement over > trusting just gcrypt, sodium and one of the OpenSSL > branches. > > Either way this is a philosophical and highly speculative topic, > no need in going on. I believe we've had different priorities > and possibly different experiences with software quality and > have therefore formed different preferences. Nothing unusual > or surprising there. Yep, completely agree that this is both individual and specualtive. Something to discuss over a beer sometime instead, maybe. =) Cheers -- Ola Bini (https://olabini.se) "Yields falsehood when quined" yields falsehood when quined.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OTR-dev mailing list OTR-dev@lists.cypherpunks.ca http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/mailman/listinfo/otr-dev
