Hi Guys,

On Mon, Jan 27, Gene Parks wrote:
> I have been thinking about this on and off and maybe some of the
> functions from Big Brothers mail interface can be of use here.

I don't think that the LOCK e-mail as proposed by Moshe is a good idea.
I think this is an unnessesary work overhead. I don't wanna send a LOCK
e-mail each time I answer a ticket.

Most people use the OTRS to handle large amounts of e-mails. So this is
not a feasable idea (IMHO). But I see the point, so lets find a good
solution. One could be to offer an IMAP port to the OTRS and to take the
risk that two people waste the same amount of time to answer a single
ticket. The system could dump the second answer to /dev/null because it
is allready answered. So first come, first get. Of course this system
has to set some default rules (e.g. an answered ticket would be a closed
ticket). Or you could send basic commands by an X-Header. But guys,
let's don't make things more complicated as nessesary. Many OTRS users
don't have a clue what an X-Header is and we are proud that we can offer
them a solution which is so easy that anybody can use it.

But anyway IMAP could be a good idea. Do we have an IMAP guru here to
implement an IMAP port? I don't think this port should be enabled by
default, but it is indeed a nice feature for some people and it can be
mixed with the standard HTML interface.

take care
  Stefan

-- 
Stefan Wintermeyer

   Don't say thing like that! Of course we'll see Master Luke again.
   He'll be quite all right, you'll see. (C3PO)                   
                                "Star Wars (The Epire Strikes Back)"
_______________________________________________
OTRS mailing list: otrs - Webpage: http://otrs.org/
Archive: http://lists.otrs.org/pipermail/otrs
To unsubscribe: http://lists.otrs.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/otrs

Reply via email to