Thanks,

I'm going to give the reporter a day or so to verify that his test now
passes, just in case, but in case I don't hear from him I'll apply it at
that point.

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:55:37PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> This was an oversight from when we groups were versioned for OF bundle 
> support. Looks good to me, too.
> 
> Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme <[email protected]>
> 
> > On Apr 19, 2017, at 11:29 AM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > Deleted groups hang around in the group table until the next grace period,
> > so it's important for the group stats code to pretend that they're gone
> > until they really get deleted.
> > 
> > Reported-by: "Timothy M. Redaelli" <[email protected]>
> > Reported-at: 
> > https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2017-April/331117.html
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > ofproto/ofproto.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto.c b/ofproto/ofproto.c
> > index 7440d5b52092..4d3d46c8ba45 100644
> > --- a/ofproto/ofproto.c
> > +++ b/ofproto/ofproto.c
> > @@ -6641,7 +6641,10 @@ handle_group_request(struct ofconn *ofconn,
> >     ovs_mutex_lock(&ofproto_mutex);
> >     if (group_id == OFPG_ALL) {
> >         CMAP_FOR_EACH (group, cmap_node, &ofproto->groups) {
> > -            cb(group, &replies);
> > +            if (versions_visible_in_version(&group->versions,
> > +                                            OVS_VERSION_MAX)) {
> > +                cb(group, &replies);
> > +            }
> >         }
> >     } else {
> >         group = ofproto_group_lookup__(ofproto, group_id, OVS_VERSION_MAX);
> > -- 
> > 2.10.2
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
> 
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to