> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, May 1, 2017 7:36 PM
> To: Weglicki, MichalX <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] ofproto-dpif-ipfix: total counters.
> 
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 03:25:13PM +0100, mweglicx wrote:
> > Implementation of IPFix counters which hold
> > total values measured since metering process startup.
> >
> > v2: Patch is reapplied for a review because
> > it hasn't been correctly marked in patchwork.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Weglicki <[email protected]>
> 
> Thanks a lot for working on IPFix!  I don't have IPFix expertise, and I
> don't think the other OVS committers have much either, so I need to ask
> some dumb questions to better understand the implications of this patch.
> 
> Actually, maybe I just need to ask one.  This changes the wire format of
> the IPFix reports that go out.  Will this require changes to IPFix
> collectors that understood the previous format, that is, is the new
> format backward compatible with collectors that expected the previous
> format?  I understand that IPFix uses a template format to tell
> collectors the format of what it's sending, but it's not clear to me
> whether or not that prevents this kind of compatibility issue.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ben.

Hello Ben, 

So counters which just got exposed through my patch are part of RFC 
which is already partially implemented in OVS. I've just added few 
missing ones, and I'm going to implement also others from same 
category (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5102#section-5.10) 

However to answer your question directly those counters are 
part of standard group of IPFix counters, so no changes on 
Collector side are required. IPFix sends counters in kind of
dictionary format, so adding any counter shouldn't break 
backward compatibility - IPFix even defines something like
enterprise counters (vendor specific) where any agent can 
define own counters in the template and send those over 
(not every collector supports it, but data-wise it shouldn't 
break anything on collector side). 

My patch was also tested against libipfix/ipfix_collector
and no additional changes were required to see new 
counters on collector side. 

Br, 
Michal. 

--------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited
Registered in Ireland
Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare
Registered Number: 308263


This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole
use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender and delete all copies.

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to