On 25 May 2017 at 18:53, Darrell Ball <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On 5/22/17, 4:44 PM, "[email protected] on behalf of Joe 
> Stringer" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
>
>     On 20 May 2017 at 11:09, Darrell Ball <[email protected]> wrote:
>     > The checks to populate ct_orig_tuple in miniflow_extract
>     > includes recirc_id being non-zero.  This is changed here
>     > to populate the ct_orig_tuple fields based only on ct_state
>     > per the logic of the design.
>     >
>     > Signed-off-by: Darrell Ball <[email protected]>
>
>     I'm not exactly sure what "per the logic of the design" is supposed to
>     mean, and I suspect that someone reading through the git logs would be
>     just as lost. As far as I'm aware, any patch to OVS should be "per the
>     logic of the design", right?
>
> In general, a change can be consistent with an
> existing design or a change to the existing design itself.
> However, “per the logic of the design” can be assumed by default
> and hence is usually considered superfluous, which I think is what you
> want to convey – sure.
>
> I’ll include the text I used on the related thread, as I agree, the
> motivation is not necessarily obvious, just by linking ct_orig_tuple to
> ct_state, as I did in this commit message.

OK, thanks!
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to