On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 07:29:29AM +0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > This series is based on Zoltan Balogh's series here: > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/770490/ > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/770487/ > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/770495/ > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/770498/ > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/770488/ > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/770489/ > > v1->v2: > - Squash fixup patches. > - Apply changes agreed with Jan. > - Not yet done: Figure out whether to really show packet_type in (some) > match_format() output. > - New patch at the end unsuccessfully tries to re-enable packet-aware > test. Either I don't have enough insight yet, or it just reveals a > bug or two. > - 4 new patches at beginning. First one is trivial. Next 3 are intended > to make it easier to debug the packet aware test that is still failing. > Jan, you don't have to feel obligated to review these if you feel they > are off-topic; I will get separate reviews.
A new concern came up while thinking about this series. The OVS_ATTR_PACKET_TYPE does not appear to be implemented in the kernel module, and what's more, because of #ifdefs, OVS_ATTR_PACKET_TYPE will actually have a different value in the kernel module than in userspace. What's the plan here? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
