Ilya Maximets <[email protected]> writes: > On 1/27/26 1:33 PM, Eelco Chaudron wrote: >> >> >> On 27 Jan 2026, at 12:02, Eelco Chaudron via dev wrote: >> >>> Move port manager instances from provider-specific data structures >>> into the common struct dpif_offload. This removes duplication across >>> providers and clarifies ownership of port-related state. >>> >>> With the port manager owned by dpif_offload, offload providers are >>> required to use the common port management APIs. This simplifies >>> external port management and eliminates the need for provider-specific >>> port enumeration logic. >>> >>> The port dump functions were also simplified using the >>> CMAP_CURSOR_FOR_EACH_CONTINUE() API. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <[email protected]> >> >> Recheck-request: github-robot >> > > Aaron, could you take a look why the successful recheck is reported > before the failed original one on the patchwork page? This makes the > patch summary on the page with all the patches show overall failure.
I'll look at it. From a quick guess, was this when the mailing lists were in a weird state recently? If so, it's possible we just got a kind of race. There is a second thing to do - I need to update the reporting script to update the existing check that has the same name. I thought it should already but seems it doesn't. > Best regards, Ilya Maximets. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
