On 1/28/26 8:45 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: > Ilya Maximets <[email protected]> writes: > >> On 1/27/26 1:33 PM, Eelco Chaudron wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 27 Jan 2026, at 12:02, Eelco Chaudron via dev wrote: >>> >>>> Move port manager instances from provider-specific data structures >>>> into the common struct dpif_offload. This removes duplication across >>>> providers and clarifies ownership of port-related state. >>>> >>>> With the port manager owned by dpif_offload, offload providers are >>>> required to use the common port management APIs. This simplifies >>>> external port management and eliminates the need for provider-specific >>>> port enumeration logic. >>>> >>>> The port dump functions were also simplified using the >>>> CMAP_CURSOR_FOR_EACH_CONTINUE() API. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <[email protected]> >>> >>> Recheck-request: github-robot >>> >> >> Aaron, could you take a look why the successful recheck is reported >> before the failed original one on the patchwork page? This makes the >> patch summary on the page with all the patches show overall failure. > > I'll look at it. From a quick guess, was this when the mailing lists > were in a weird state recently? If so, it's possible we just got a kind > of race.
Ah, yes, that might be the case. > > There is a second thing to do - I need to update the reporting script to > update the existing check that has the same name. I thought it should > already but seems it doesn't. > >> Best regards, Ilya Maximets. > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
