On Fri, Feb 6, 2026 at 3:51 PM Dumitru Ceara via dev < [email protected]> wrote:
> On 2/5/26 5:07 PM, Lorenzo Bianconi via dev wrote: > > On Feb 04, Xavier Simonart via dev wrote: > >> Both ovn-ic and ovn-northod were trying to update Service_Monitor > options > >> az-name, but their updates were differing by the _comment. > >> This resulted in 100% CPU use by ovn-northd and ovn-ic. > >> > >> The test "Service Monitor synchronization" was hitting the issue, but > was > >> successful. The test has been updated to detect the issue and fail if > the issue > >> is still encountered. > >> > > Hi Xavier, > > This is not an actual review, just a note (maybe relevant only to us in > Red Hat) that the Reported-at link is a bit off. > > >> Reported-at: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/FDP-2657 > > It should be: > > Reported-at: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/FDP-2672 > > Which is the "upstream" child of the FDP-2657 epic. > > >> Fixes: f40a5c3c803a ("ic: Implement cross-AZ service monitor > synchronization.") > >> Signed-off-by: Xavier Simonart <[email protected]> > > > > Acked-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]> > > > > Regards, > Dumitru > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev > > Thank Xavier, Lorenzo and Dumitru, I have updated the link, merged this into main and backported down to 25.09. Regards, Ales _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
