On Mon, Feb 9, 2026, 11:47 Numan Siddique <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 9:44 AM Ales Musil <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 12:13 PM Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 1/26/26 1:22 PM, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> >> > Hi everyone,
> >> >
> >> > Since Friday, January 23rd, OVN is effectively in the "soft freeze"
> >> > state in preparation for the branching and release of OVN 26.03.0.
> >> > As per Documentation/internals/release-process.rst, this means:
> >> >
> >> >    During the freeze, we ask committers to refrain from applying
> patches that
> >> >    add new features unless those patches were already posted for
> public review
> >> >    and had received public review feedback on the mailing list before
> the
> >> >    freeze began.  Bug fixes are welcome at any time.  Please propose
> and
> >> >    discuss exceptions on ovs-dev.
> >> >
> >> > The 26.03 branch is scheduled to be created in ~4 weeks from now,
> >> > on Friday, February 20th and the release should be another 4 weeks
> >> > later, on Friday, March 20th.
> >> >
> >> > There are currently, on the mailing list (and in patchwork), quite
> >> > a few patch sets that have already been discussed and reviewed to
> >> > some reasonable extent (for some of them changes have been
> >> > requested).  All these, of course, qualify for potential
> >> > acceptance in 26.03.0.
> >> >
> >> > If there are new patches that never been reviewed or have not been
> >> > posted yet, please propose an exception in reply to this email and
> >> > we can discuss further.
> >> >
> >> > In my opinion, one not-yet-posted series that should be treated
> >> > as an exception, is the follow up work requested for [0]:
> >> >
> >> > "[ovs-dev] ovn-nb, ovn-nbctl: Add ID column to Network_Function
> table."
> >> > which implies that a significant change needs to happen inside
> >> > the implementation of the Network Function feature - this change
> >> > has only informally been discussed on-list, the patch is yet to
> >> > be posted.  However, in order to avoid upgrade issues post 26.03
> >> > it's preferable if we include this work in the current release.
> >> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Dumitru,
> >
> > thank you for raising this up.
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> I know it's a bit late but I'd like to discuss one more thing:
> >>
> >> OVN's EVPN support is marked as experimental but based on discussions
> >> with potential users we're quite confident it's usable in its current
> >> form.  So I'm planning to prepare a patch that removes its
> >> "experimental" designation in 26.03.  I assume that's OK.
> >>
> >> But, before I do that I'd also like to remove the default
> >> "dynamic-routing-*-ifname" values.  OVN assumes that if the user didn't
> >> configure the vxlan/bridge/lo interface names explicitly for a given
> >> EVPN enabled logical switch then they exist on the host with the names
> >> "br-$vni", "vxlan-$vni", "lo-$vni".  This doesn't play well with
> >> dual-stack scenarios where we'd also need a "vxlan-v6-$vni" (or similar)
> >> interface.
> >>
> >> I'm actually thinking now that it makes no sense to assume this naming
> >> scheme and it's probably better if the CMS just configures explicit
> >> names.  So I'd also like to work and post a patch that removes this part
> >> of the feature (the implied default interface names) as it's not really
> >> useful.
> >>
> >> As that might be a bit against our soft freeze rules, I'd like to
> >> request an exception keeping in mind, again, that this is an
> >> experimental feature and that we're not really changing any of the
> >> behavior, just removing (unfortunate) defaults.
> >
> >
> > Obviously I'm biased, but no objections from my side.
>
> No objections from me either.
>
> Numan
>
> +1 from me as well.
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Dumitru
> >>
> >> > Regards,
> >> > Dumitru
> >> >
> >> > [0]
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ovn/patch/[email protected]/
> >>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ales
>
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to