On 2/10/26 6:25 AM, Han Zhou wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 3:51 PM Mark Michelson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2026, 11:47 Numan Siddique <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 9:44 AM Ales Musil <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 12:13 PM Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/26/26 1:22 PM, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since Friday, January 23rd, OVN is effectively in the "soft freeze"
>>>>>> state in preparation for the branching and release of OVN 26.03.0.
>>>>>> As per Documentation/internals/release-process.rst, this means:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    During the freeze, we ask committers to refrain from applying
> patches that
>>>>>>    add new features unless those patches were already posted for
> public review
>>>>>>    and had received public review feedback on the mailing list
> before the
>>>>>>    freeze began.  Bug fixes are welcome at any time.  Please
> propose and
>>>>>>    discuss exceptions on ovs-dev.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The 26.03 branch is scheduled to be created in ~4 weeks from now,
>>>>>> on Friday, February 20th and the release should be another 4 weeks
>>>>>> later, on Friday, March 20th.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are currently, on the mailing list (and in patchwork), quite
>>>>>> a few patch sets that have already been discussed and reviewed to
>>>>>> some reasonable extent (for some of them changes have been
>>>>>> requested).  All these, of course, qualify for potential
>>>>>> acceptance in 26.03.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If there are new patches that never been reviewed or have not been
>>>>>> posted yet, please propose an exception in reply to this email and
>>>>>> we can discuss further.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In my opinion, one not-yet-posted series that should be treated
>>>>>> as an exception, is the follow up work requested for [0]:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "[ovs-dev] ovn-nb, ovn-nbctl: Add ID column to Network_Function
> table."
>>>>>> which implies that a significant change needs to happen inside
>>>>>> the implementation of the Network Function feature - this change
>>>>>> has only informally been discussed on-list, the patch is yet to
>>>>>> be posted.  However, in order to avoid upgrade issues post 26.03
>>>>>> it's preferable if we include this work in the current release.
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Dumitru,
>>>>
>>>> thank you for raising this up.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I know it's a bit late but I'd like to discuss one more thing:
>>>>>
>>>>> OVN's EVPN support is marked as experimental but based on discussions
>>>>> with potential users we're quite confident it's usable in its current
>>>>> form.  So I'm planning to prepare a patch that removes its
>>>>> "experimental" designation in 26.03.  I assume that's OK.
>>>>>
>>>>> But, before I do that I'd also like to remove the default
>>>>> "dynamic-routing-*-ifname" values.  OVN assumes that if the user
> didn't
>>>>> configure the vxlan/bridge/lo interface names explicitly for a given
>>>>> EVPN enabled logical switch then they exist on the host with the names
>>>>> "br-$vni", "vxlan-$vni", "lo-$vni".  This doesn't play well with
>>>>> dual-stack scenarios where we'd also need a "vxlan-v6-$vni" (or
> similar)
>>>>> interface.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm actually thinking now that it makes no sense to assume this naming
>>>>> scheme and it's probably better if the CMS just configures explicit
>>>>> names.  So I'd also like to work and post a patch that removes this
> part
>>>>> of the feature (the implied default interface names) as it's not
> really
>>>>> useful.
>>>>>
>>>>> As that might be a bit against our soft freeze rules, I'd like to
>>>>> request an exception keeping in mind, again, that this is an
>>>>> experimental feature and that we're not really changing any of the
>>>>> behavior, just removing (unfortunate) defaults.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Obviously I'm biased, but no objections from my side.
>>>
>>> No objections from me either.
>>>
>>> Numan
>>>
>>> +1 from me as well.
>>>>
>>>>>
> 
> No objections from me.
> 
> Han
> 

Thanks, all, for the feedback!  I opened a task internally on our side
to work on this before we branch for 26.03.

Regards,
Dumitru

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to