On 2/3/26 10:23 AM, Dumitru Ceara wrote: > On 2/2/26 12:37 PM, Ales Musil wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 11:39 AM Dumitru Ceara via dev <ovs- >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Ideally this gives us more coverage and confidence before the 26.03.0 >> release. >> >> Dumitru Ceara (2): >> ci: ovn-kubernetes: Move our CI jobs to OVN-K release-1.2 branch. >> ci: ovn-kubernetes: Enable ovn-k UDN tests in our CI. >> >> .ci/ovn-kubernetes/prepare.sh | 3 ++- >> .github/workflows/ovn-kubernetes.yml | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++------ >> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 2.52.0 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dev mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev <https:// >> mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev> >> >>
Hi Ales, >> Thank you Dumitru, >> >> I went ahead and merged both into main. I wasn't sure if/what we want to >> backport, so please let me know and I can take care of it. > > > Thanks, Ales! I think it's fine to not backport this. It will be > executed on branch-26.03 when that one gets created. > > OVN-kubernetes already runs a (Fedora) version of 25.09 in their CI so > we already get some indirect coverage from there. > > I'd leave it as is for now. > Maybe we should reconsider this and backport patch 1/2 to all stable branches and test with ovn-kubernetes release-1.2 in our CI as well. Jobs have started failing on those branches recently (probably due to things already fixed in ovn-kubernetes in 1.2). What do you think? Thanks, Dumitru > Thanks, > Dumitru > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
