On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 4:10 PM Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2/3/26 10:23 AM, Dumitru Ceara wrote: > > On 2/2/26 12:37 PM, Ales Musil wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 11:39 AM Dumitru Ceara via dev <ovs- > >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> > >> Ideally this gives us more coverage and confidence before the > 26.03.0 > >> release. > >> > >> Dumitru Ceara (2): > >> ci: ovn-kubernetes: Move our CI jobs to OVN-K release-1.2 branch. > >> ci: ovn-kubernetes: Enable ovn-k UDN tests in our CI. > >> > >> .ci/ovn-kubernetes/prepare.sh | 3 ++- > >> .github/workflows/ovn-kubernetes.yml | 40 > ++++++++++++++++++++++------ > >> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > >> > >> -- > >> 2.52.0 > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> dev mailing list > >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev <https:// > >> mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev> > >> > >> > > Hi Ales, > > >> Thank you Dumitru, > >> > >> I went ahead and merged both into main. I wasn't sure if/what we want to > >> backport, so please let me know and I can take care of it. > > > > > > Thanks, Ales! I think it's fine to not backport this. It will be > > executed on branch-26.03 when that one gets created. > > > > OVN-kubernetes already runs a (Fedora) version of 25.09 in their CI so > > we already get some indirect coverage from there. > > > > I'd leave it as is for now. > > > > Maybe we should reconsider this and backport patch 1/2 to all stable > branches and test with ovn-kubernetes release-1.2 in our CI as well. > Jobs have started failing on those branches recently (probably due to > things already fixed in ovn-kubernetes in 1.2). > > What do you think? > I'm fine with that, I can take care of it. > Thanks, > Dumitru > > > Thanks, > > Dumitru > > > > Regard, Ales _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
