Thanks Kevin
Naming is hard.
The name looks a bit more intuitive and matches closely with the description
previously added.
Darrell
On 8/30/17, 10:45 AM, "Kevin Traynor" <ktray...@redhat.com> wrote:
rxq_interval was added before there was other #defines
and code related to rxq intervals.
Rename to rxq_next_cycles_store in order to make it more intuitive.
Reported-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>
---
lib/dpif-netdev.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/dpif-netdev.c b/lib/dpif-netdev.c
index 071ec14..55d5656 100644
--- a/lib/dpif-netdev.c
+++ b/lib/dpif-netdev.c
@@ -576,5 +576,5 @@ struct dp_netdev_pmd_thread {
/* End of the next time interval for which processing cycles
are stored for each polled rxq. */
- long long int rxq_interval;
+ long long int rxq_next_cycle_store;
/* Statistics. */
@@ -4507,5 +4507,5 @@ dp_netdev_configure_pmd(struct dp_netdev_pmd_thread
*pmd, struct dp_netdev *dp,
cmap_init(&pmd->classifiers);
pmd->next_optimization = time_msec() + DPCLS_OPTIMIZATION_INTERVAL;
- pmd->rxq_interval = time_msec() + PMD_RXQ_INTERVAL_LEN;
+ pmd->rxq_next_cycle_store = time_msec() + PMD_RXQ_INTERVAL_LEN;
hmap_init(&pmd->poll_list);
hmap_init(&pmd->tx_ports);
@@ -5951,5 +5951,5 @@ dp_netdev_pmd_try_optimize(struct
dp_netdev_pmd_thread *pmd,
long long int now = time_msec();
- if (now > pmd->rxq_interval) {
+ if (now > pmd->rxq_next_cycle_store) {
/* Get the cycles that were used to process each queue and store.
*/
for (unsigned i = 0; i < poll_cnt; i++) {
@@ -5961,5 +5961,5 @@ dp_netdev_pmd_try_optimize(struct
dp_netdev_pmd_thread *pmd,
}
/* Start new measuring interval */
- pmd->rxq_interval = now + PMD_RXQ_INTERVAL_LEN;
+ pmd->rxq_next_cycle_store = now + PMD_RXQ_INTERVAL_LEN;
}
--
1.8.3.1
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
