Are there any other comments?


On 8/30/17, 10:49 AM, "Darrell Ball" <db...@vmware.com> wrote:

    Thanks Kevin
    
    Naming is hard.
    The name looks a bit more intuitive and matches closely with the 
description previously added.
    
    Darrell
    
    On 8/30/17, 10:45 AM, "Kevin Traynor" <ktray...@redhat.com> wrote:
    
        rxq_interval was added before there was other #defines
        and code related to rxq intervals.
        
        Rename to rxq_next_cycles_store in order to make it more intuitive.
        
        Reported-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@samsung.com>
        Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>
        ---
         lib/dpif-netdev.c | 8 ++++----
         1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
        
        diff --git a/lib/dpif-netdev.c b/lib/dpif-netdev.c
        index 071ec14..55d5656 100644
        --- a/lib/dpif-netdev.c
        +++ b/lib/dpif-netdev.c
        @@ -576,5 +576,5 @@ struct dp_netdev_pmd_thread {
             /* End of the next time interval for which processing cycles
                are stored for each polled rxq. */
        -    long long int rxq_interval;
        +    long long int rxq_next_cycle_store;
         
             /* Statistics. */
        @@ -4507,5 +4507,5 @@ dp_netdev_configure_pmd(struct 
dp_netdev_pmd_thread *pmd, struct dp_netdev *dp,
             cmap_init(&pmd->classifiers);
             pmd->next_optimization = time_msec() + DPCLS_OPTIMIZATION_INTERVAL;
        -    pmd->rxq_interval = time_msec() + PMD_RXQ_INTERVAL_LEN;
        +    pmd->rxq_next_cycle_store = time_msec() + PMD_RXQ_INTERVAL_LEN;
             hmap_init(&pmd->poll_list);
             hmap_init(&pmd->tx_ports);
        @@ -5951,5 +5951,5 @@ dp_netdev_pmd_try_optimize(struct 
dp_netdev_pmd_thread *pmd,
             long long int now = time_msec();
         
        -    if (now > pmd->rxq_interval) {
        +    if (now > pmd->rxq_next_cycle_store) {
                 /* Get the cycles that were used to process each queue and 
store. */
                 for (unsigned i = 0; i < poll_cnt; i++) {
        @@ -5961,5 +5961,5 @@ dp_netdev_pmd_try_optimize(struct 
dp_netdev_pmd_thread *pmd,
                 }
                 /* Start new measuring interval */
        -        pmd->rxq_interval = now + PMD_RXQ_INTERVAL_LEN;
        +        pmd->rxq_next_cycle_store = now + PMD_RXQ_INTERVAL_LEN;
             }
         
        -- 
        1.8.3.1
        
        
    
    

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to