On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:34:07PM +0000, Darrell Ball wrote: > > > On 9/25/17, 12:41 PM, "Ben Pfaff" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 06:37:29PM +0000, Darrell Ball wrote: > > > > > > On 9/25/17, 11:31 AM, "Ben Pfaff" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 06:28:46PM +0000, Darrell Ball wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 9/25/17, 10:49 AM, "[email protected] on behalf > of Justin Pettit" <[email protected] on behalf of > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 25, 2017, at 5:54 AM, Russell Bryant > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > There's some important changes in branch-2.7. Can we do a > 2.7.3 > > > > release soon? Does anyone have anything they need > addressed first? > > > > > > I'm happy to do a release. I think we're due for a 2.8.1 > release, too. > > > > > > Ian wants a DPDK patch moved into branch-2.8. Is there > anything else that's important? > > > > > > > > > 2.8.0 was Aug 31. > > > Maybe 2.8.1 can wait a couple weeks to give time for other > potential fixes? > > > > There will always be more fixes, and we can always do more releases. > > > > Do you know of important fixes that are in the works? > > > > There are a couple backport requests in the dpdk merge. > > OK. > > I merged that request, and backported one of them, but "netdev-dpdk: > reset packet_type for reused dp_packets." had a conflict. Can you send > out a backport? > > I sent out a two patch series backport request here > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/list/?series=5042
Thanks, I applied these to branch-2.8. > > > Also, ideally, I would like to include > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.ozlabs.org_patch_816712_&d=DwIBAg&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=BVhFA09CGX7JQ5Ih-uZnsw&m=dUNQc7lLVYHsKc9aahwyrvZMr8T9MBwGKdlBzWvttMM&s=EyJ0ntHzrXaLo0BMDREZnHkpMhNLixvNi-HdUDBoWzQ&e= > > > as well. > > Just patch 5 from that series? Usually, I expect important bug fixes to > be early in a series. > > I changed the ordering of the patches, so that patches 1-3 are relevant to > backporting and sent a new version > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/list/?series=5051 > The changes are borderline in meeting the test for backporting, but I think > the debug change would be nice to have. Thanks. I applied the series to master and the first 3 patches to branch-2.8. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
