> On Jan 2, 2018, at 10:13 AM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 02:25:13PM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
>> Previously, the ofproto instance and OpenFlow port have been derived
>> based on the datapath port number.  This change explicitly declares them
>> both, which will be helpful in future commits that no longer can depend
>> on having a unique datapath port (e.g., a source port that represents
>> the controller).
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit <[email protected]>
> 
> Some checkpatch warnings look legit:
> 
> WARNING: Line length is >79-characters long
> #34 FILE: lib/odp-util.c:457:
>                      && cookie.header.type == USER_ACTION_COOKIE_FLOW_SAMPLE) 
> {
> 
> WARNING: Line length is >79-characters long
> #259 FILE: ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c:1101:
>             = 
> ofproto_dpif_lookup_by_uuid(&upcall->cookie.header.ofproto_uuid);
> 
> WARNING: Line length is >79-characters long
> #307 FILE: ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c:2072:
>                          ofp_in_port, odp_actions, smid, cmid, 
> &ofproto->uuid);
> 
> There's a stray " in this line in odp-util.h:
> +    enum user_action_cookie_type type; /* One of USER_ACTION_COOKIE_*" */

I addressed those issues.

> Maybe you like the way you did it, which is fine, but an alternative way
> to arrange user_action_cookie would be to make it a struct with the
> standard header followed by embedding further structs inside an
> anonymous union, like below.  Then you could omit lots of ".header."
> stuff although you'd need to s/union/struct/ in other places.
> 
> /* user_action_cookie is passed as argument to OVS_ACTION_ATTR_USERSPACE. */
> struct user_action_cookie {
>    enum user_action_cookie_type type; /* One of USER_ACTION_COOKIE_*" */
>    ofp_port_t ofp_in_port;            /* OpenFlow in port, or OFPP_NONE. */
>    struct uuid ofproto_uuid;          /* UUID of ofproto-dpif. */
> 
>    union {
>        struct {
>            /* USER_ACTION_COOKIE_SFLOW. */
>            ovs_be16 vlan_tci;      /* Destination VLAN TCI. */
>            uint32_t output;        /* SFL_FLOW_SAMPLE_TYPE 'output' value. */
>        } sflow;
> 
>        struct {
>            /* USER_ACTION_COOKIE_SLOW_PATH. */
>            uint32_t reason;        /* enum slow_path_reason. */
>        } slow_path;
> 
>        struct {
>            /* USER_ACTION_COOKIE_FLOW_SAMPLE. */
>            uint16_t probability;   /* Sampling probability. */
>            uint32_t collector_set_id; /* ID of IPFIX collector set. */
>            uint32_t obs_domain_id; /* Observation Domain ID. */
>            uint32_t obs_point_id;  /* Observation Point ID. */
>            odp_port_t output_odp_port; /* The output odp port. */
>            enum nx_action_sample_direction direction;
>        } flow_sample;
> 
>        struct {
>            /* USER_ACTION_COOKIE_IPFIX. */
>            odp_port_t output_odp_port; /* The output odp port. */
>        } ipfix;
>    };
> };
> 
> It looks like the shortest user_action_cookie variation is 24 bytes, the
> longest is 48.  It may not be worth it to treat user_action_cookie as
> variable-length now.  I think that it was done this way to better
> tolerate old datapaths that had a short, fixed maximum length for
> userdata.  It would be simpler to just always ship sizeof(union
> user_action_cookie) bytes to the datapath and always require
> sizeof(union user_action_cookie) back.  You could then skip a lot of
> userdata_len checks and updates for each type of cookie.

These are good suggestions.  I want to send it as a separate patch because it 
contains more subtlety than I'd want to do as an incremental.

> Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <[email protected]>

Thanks!

--Justin


_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to