Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> writes: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 12:16:24PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> > > This still needs a review.
Looks good, but I found one part slightly confusing. >> + These compromises wouldn't suit every site, since some might want to >> + allocate more bits to the datapath, some to the egress port. I'm having trouble with the clarity in the final clause of this paragraph. Maybe reprase as: + These compromises wouldn't suit every site, since some deployments + may need to allocate more bits to the datapath or egress port + identifiers. Otherwise, Acked-by: Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com> _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
