On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 01:55:31PM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote: > Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 12:16:24PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> > > > > This still needs a review. > > Looks good, but I found one part slightly confusing. > > >> + These compromises wouldn't suit every site, since some might want to > >> + allocate more bits to the datapath, some to the egress port. > > I'm having trouble with the clarity in the final clause of this > paragraph. Maybe reprase as: > > + These compromises wouldn't suit every site, since some deployments > + may need to allocate more bits to the datapath or egress port > + identifiers. > > Otherwise, > Acked-by: Aaron Conole <[email protected]>
Thanks! I applied your suggestion and then pushed this to master. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
