On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:04 PM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:59:31PM +0530, Sriharsha Basavapatna via dev wrote:
>> This is the first patch in the patch-set to support dynamic rebalancing
>> of offloaded flows.
>>
>> The patch detects OOR condition on a netdev port when ENOSPC error is
>> returned by TC-Flower while adding a flow rule. A new structure is added
>> to the netdev called "netdev_hw_info", to store OOR related information
>> required to perform dynamic offload-rebalancing.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sriharsha Basavapatna <[email protected]>
>> Co-authored-by: Venkat Duvvuru <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Venkat Duvvuru <[email protected]>
>> Reviewed-by: Sathya Perla <[email protected]>
>
> Thanks for the patches and for the recent information on their
> performance benefits and costs.  Please incorporate that information
> into the next version of the series.

Thanks for your review comments. Please see my response inline.
>
> I have some comments.
>
> Some of the style differs from what we usually expect.  Here, I see some
> 8-space indentation (or maybe it's a tab? not sure) in parse_flow_put();
> please use 4-space indentation.  In flow_get_tunnel_netdev, there's a
> return of the form "return (x);"; please omit the parentheses.

done.
>
> I don't think that the tunnel_netdev variable is needed in
> flow_get_tunnel_netdev().

done.
>
> This patch doesn't provide a function to read the oor or netdev_hw_info
> for a netdev.  The netdev struct is supposed to be opaque to clients;
> please provide an interface rather than having clients directly access
> the member.

done.
>
> Please don't add a blank line above netdev_ports_flow_init().

done.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ben.

Thanks,
-Harsha
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to