On 2/7/2019 1:00 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
This fixes build with NUMA_AWARE_HUGEPAGES enabled and VHOST_NUMA
disabled. This should not be a usual case. But it's possible to
configure DPDK this way.
Out of interest, with RTE_EAL_NUMA_AWARE_HUGEPAGES defined but not
RTE_LIBRTE_VHOST_NUMA, does vhost numa still work as expected?
Ian
Fixes: 5e925ccc2a6f ("netdev-dpdk: DPDK v17.11 upgrade")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <[email protected]>
---
acinclude.m4 | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/acinclude.m4 b/acinclude.m4
index c51af246a..e2af4ee16 100644
--- a/acinclude.m4
+++ b/acinclude.m4
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ AC_DEFUN([OVS_CHECK_DPDK], [
AC_LANG_PROGRAM(
[
#include <rte_config.h>
-#if RTE_LIBRTE_VHOST_NUMA
+#if defined(RTE_LIBRTE_VHOST_NUMA) || defined(RTE_EAL_NUMA_AWARE_HUGEPAGES)
#error
#endif
], [])
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
