On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 09:04:05AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 02:17:07PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote: > > From my point of view travisci passing is a base requirement > > for applying patches, in particular backports to released versions. > > I agree in principle, but I don't know how to work that in with the > number of patches I apply. It would blow up my workflow and I would be > ineffective. > > If we designated a new LTS, then it would work out better because there > wouldn't be 7 release branches to deal with.
Thanks Ben, I appreciate its easier for me to make a sweeping statement than to implement a working system. But I think its a discussion worth having. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
