On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 09:10:12AM +0100, Simon Horman wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 09:04:05AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 02:17:07PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote: > > > From my point of view travisci passing is a base requirement > > > for applying patches, in particular backports to released versions. > > > > I agree in principle, but I don't know how to work that in with the > > number of patches I apply. It would blow up my workflow and I would be > > ineffective. > > > > If we designated a new LTS, then it would work out better because there > > wouldn't be 7 release branches to deal with. > > Thanks Ben, > > I appreciate its easier for me to make a sweeping statement than to > implement a working system. But I think its a discussion worth having.
It might be possible to set up a system where patches can be pushed to testing queues and then automatically pushed to the release branches if the tests succeed. I've seen that kind of system work elsewhere. I don't know how much work it would be to set it up. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
