As commented, previously flex_array was used because "we can have large
hash-table without large contiguous kernel memory".
Actually how large can the flow hash table can be? Will this backport
affect currently supported hash table size?
Thanks,
Yifeng
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 9:06 AM 0-day Robot <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Bleep bloop. Greetings Gregory Rose, I am a robot and I have tried out your
> patch.
> Thanks for your contribution.
>
> I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
>
>
> checkpatch:
> ERROR: Author Kent Overstreet <[email protected]> needs to sign off.
> WARNING: Unexpected sign-offs from developers who are not authors or
> co-authors or committers: Greg Rose <[email protected]>
> Lines checked: 208, Warnings: 1, Errors: 1
>
>
> Please check this out. If you feel there has been an error, please email
> [email protected]
>
> Thanks,
> 0-day Robot
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
