On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 05:29:16PM -0700, Darrell Ball wrote: > There are a few cases where structure copy can be replaced by > memcpy(), for possible portability benefit. This is because > the structures involved have padding and elements of the > structure are used to generate hashes. > > Signed-off-by: Darrell Ball <dlu...@gmail.com>
Thanks for the backports. I applied them to branch-2.9. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
