On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 09:47:10AM -0700, Gregory Rose wrote: > > On 5/12/2020 8:18 PM, Martin Varghese wrote: > >On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:19:24PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > >>On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 10:40:43PM +0530, Martin Varghese wrote: > >>>From: Martin Varghese <[email protected]> > >>> > >>>UDP tunnel encapsulation module for tunnelling different protocols like > >>>MPLS, IP, NSH etc > >>> > >>>The Bareudp tunnel module provides a generic UDP L3 encapsulation > >>>tunnelling module for tunnelling different protocols like MPLS,IP,NSH etc. > >>>inside a UDP tunnel. > >>> > >>>Signed-off-by: Martin Varghese <[email protected]> > >> > >>What's the upstream status of the Linux datapath support? That is, does > >>the bareudp code here work with the upstream Linux kernel openvswitch > >>module? If it does, then it's ready for review here. (We have an > >>"upstream-first" policy.) > > > >Yes it is merged to net-next sometime back. > >Please see the commits below. > > > >4b5f672 net: Special handling for IP & MPLS. > >571912c net: UDP tunnel encapsulation module for tunnelling different > >protocols like MPLS, IP, NSH etc. > > Thank you for backporting these patches Martin. We like to see a > reference to the upstream commits in the backports for the out of > tree driver. See commit 73a6e112a539 " datapath: conntrack: mark > expected switch fall-through" for an example. >
This patch has backport of the bareudp tunnel to ovs tree + userspace changes to support bareudp tunnel And the bareudp support is merged to net-next is 2 commits.I wasn't sure how to mention those details in this commit Can i add the details of both the commits to the current commit messageg with tag upstream commit > Regards, > > - Greg > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >dev mailing list > >[email protected] > >https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
