> On 12/16/20 2:00 PM, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> >> From: Ian Stokes <[email protected]>
> >>
> >
> > Thanks for working and sending this Sunil.
> >
> > @Ilya, does this resolve your concerns WRT the pkg-config check and ARM
> build in travis?
> 
> It works fine.  GHA passed and Travis for Arm works fine too.
> Some small coments inline.

Thanks for checking.

> 
> <sinp>
> 
> >> diff --git a/acinclude.m4 b/acinclude.m4
> >> index ddf4b71e1..eb0496c25 100644
> >> --- a/acinclude.m4
> >> +++ b/acinclude.m4
> >> @@ -334,8 +334,9 @@ dnl
> >>  dnl Configure DPDK source tree
> >>  AC_DEFUN([OVS_CHECK_DPDK], [
> >>    AC_ARG_WITH([dpdk],
> >> -              [AC_HELP_STRING([--with-dpdk=/path/to/dpdk],
> >> -                              [Specify the DPDK build directory])],
> >> +              [AC_HELP_STRING([--with-dpdk=static|shared|yes],
> >> +                              [Specify "static" or "shared" depending on 
> >> the
> >> +                              DPDK libraries to use])],
> >>                [have_dpdk=true])
> >>
> >>    AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether dpdk is enabled])
> >> @@ -345,35 +346,45 @@ AC_DEFUN([OVS_CHECK_DPDK], [
> >>    else
> >>      AC_MSG_RESULT([yes])
> >>      case "$with_dpdk" in
> >> -      yes)
> >> -        DPDK_AUTO_DISCOVER="true"
> >> -        PKG_CHECK_MODULES_STATIC([DPDK], [libdpdk], [
> >> -            DPDK_INCLUDE="$DPDK_CFLAGS"
> >> -            DPDK_LIB="$DPDK_LIBS"], [
> >> -            DPDK_INCLUDE="-I/usr/local/include/dpdk -I/usr/include/dpdk"
> >> -            DPDK_LIB="-ldpdk"])
> >> -        ;;
> >> -      *)
> >> -        DPDK_AUTO_DISCOVER="false"
> >> -        DPDK_INCLUDE_PATH="$with_dpdk/include"
> >> -        # If 'with_dpdk' is passed install directory, point to headers
> >> -        # installed in $DESTDIR/$prefix/include/dpdk
> >> -        if test -e "$DPDK_INCLUDE_PATH/rte_config.h"; then
> >> -           DPDK_INCLUDE="-I$DPDK_INCLUDE_PATH"
> >> -        elif test -e "$DPDK_INCLUDE_PATH/dpdk/rte_config.h"; then
> >> -           DPDK_INCLUDE="-I$DPDK_INCLUDE_PATH/dpdk"
> >> -        fi
> >> -        DPDK_LIB_DIR="$with_dpdk/lib"
> >> -        DPDK_LIB="-ldpdk"
> >> -        ;;
> >> +      "shared")
> >> +          PKG_CHECK_MODULES([DPDK], [libdpdk], [
> >> +              DPDK_INCLUDE="$DPDK_CFLAGS"
> >> +              DPDK_LIB="$DPDK_LIBS"], [
> >> +              DPDK_INCLUDE="-I/usr/local/include/dpdk -I/usr/include/dpdk"
> >> +              DPDK_LIB="-ldpdk"])
> >> +              ;;
> >> +      "static" | "yes")
> >> +          PKG_CHECK_MODULES_STATIC([DPDK], [libdpdk], [
> >> +              DPDK_INCLUDE="$DPDK_CFLAGS"
> >> +              DPDK_LIB="$DPDK_LIBS"], [
> >> +              DPDK_INCLUDE="-I/usr/local/include/dpdk -I/usr/include/dpdk"
> >> +              DPDK_LIB="-ldpdk"])
> >> +
> >> +          dnl Statically linked private DPDK objects of form
> >> +          dnl -l:file.a must be positioned between
> >> +          dnl --whole-archive ... --no-whole-archive linker parameters.
> >> +          dnl Old pkg-config versions misplace --no-whole-archive 
> >> parameter
> >> +          dnl and put it next to --whole-archive.
> >> +          AC_MSG_CHECKING([for faulty pkg-config version])
> >> +          echo "$DPDK_LIB" | grep -q 
> >> 'whole-archive.*l:lib.*no-whole-archive'
> >> +          status=$?
> >> +          case $status in
> >> +            0)
> >> +              AC_MSG_RESULT([no])
> >> +              ;;
> >> +            1)
> >> +            AC_MSG_RESULT([yes])
> >> +            AC_MSG_ERROR([Please upgrade.pkg-config])
> 
> Indentation of above lines is a bit off.  And the text is a bit strange to me.
> Why is there a period in the middle of sentence?
> 

Agreed, can remove this period and align correctly.

> >> +              ;;
> >> +            *)
> >> +              AC_MSG_ERROR([grep exited with status $status])
> >> +              ;;
> >> +          esac
> >>      esac
> >>
> >>      ovs_save_CFLAGS="$CFLAGS"
> >>      ovs_save_LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS"
> >>      CFLAGS="$CFLAGS $DPDK_INCLUDE"
> >> -    if test "$DPDK_AUTO_DISCOVER" = "false"; then
> >> -      LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -L${DPDK_LIB_DIR}"
> >> -    fi
> >>
> >>      AC_CHECK_HEADERS([rte_config.h], [], [
> >>        AC_MSG_ERROR([unable to find rte_config.h in $with_dpdk])
> >> @@ -422,20 +433,18 @@ AC_DEFUN([OVS_CHECK_DPDK], [
> >>        [AC_MSG_RESULT([yes])
> >>         DPDKLIB_FOUND=true],
> >>        [AC_MSG_RESULT([no])
> >> -       if test "$DPDK_AUTO_DISCOVER" = "true"; then
> >> -         AC_MSG_ERROR(m4_normalize([
> >> -            Could not find DPDK library in default search path, Use 
> >> --with-dpdk
> >> -            to specify the DPDK library installed in non-standard 
> >> location]))
> >> -       else
> >> -         AC_MSG_ERROR([Could not find DPDK libraries in $DPDK_LIB_DIR])
> >> -       fi
> >> +       AC_MSG_ERROR(m4_normalize([
> >> +          Could not find DPDK library in default search path, update
> >> +          PKG_CONFIG_PATH for pkg-config to find the .pc file in
> >> +          non-standard location]))
> >>        ])
> >>
> >>      CFLAGS="$ovs_save_CFLAGS"
> >>      LDFLAGS="$ovs_save_LDFLAGS"
> >> -    if test "$DPDK_AUTO_DISCOVER" = "false"; then
> >> -      OVS_LDFLAGS="$OVS_LDFLAGS -L$DPDK_LIB_DIR"
> >> -    fi
> >> +    # Stripping out possible instruction set specific configuration that 
> >> DPDK
> >> +    # forces in pkg-config since this could override user-specified 
> >> options.
> >> +    # It's enough to have -mssse3 to build with DPDK headers.
> >> +    DPDK_INCLUDE=$(echo "$DPDK_INCLUDE" | sed 's/-march=[[^ ]]*//g')
> >>      OVS_CFLAGS="$OVS_CFLAGS $DPDK_INCLUDE"
> >>      OVS_ENABLE_OPTION([-mssse3])
> >>
> >> @@ -444,17 +453,16 @@ AC_DEFUN([OVS_CHECK_DPDK], [
> >>      # This happens because the rest of the DPDK code doesn't use any 
> >> symbol
> in
> >>      # the pmd driver objects, and the drivers register themselves using an
> >>      # __attribute__((constructor)) function.
> >> -    #
> >> -    # These options are specified inside a single -Wl directive to prevent
> >> -    # autotools from reordering them.
> >> -    #
> >> -    # OTOH newer versions of dpdk pkg-config (generated with Meson)
> >> -    # will already have flagged just the right set of libs with
> >> -    # --whole-archive - in those cases do not wrap it once more.
> >> -    case "$DPDK_LIB" in
> >> -      *whole-archive*) DPDK_vswitchd_LDFLAGS=$DPDK_LIB;;
> >> -      *) DPDK_vswitchd_LDFLAGS=-Wl,--whole-archive,$DPDK_LIB,--no-
> whole-
> >> archive
> >> -    esac
> >> +
> 
> This empty line divides a comment into 2 separate comments.  With that, first
> part of a comment looks like it's not related to the second one.
> I think, it should be a single comment block, otherwise, it's unclear why 
> we're
> talking about 'whole-archive' stuff there at all.
> 

OK, we can move this back to one comment.

With these changes are you happy for me to commit with your ack?

Regards
Ian
> >> +    # Wrap the DPDK libraries inside a single -Wl directive
> >> +    # after comma separation to prevent autotools from reordering them.
> >> +    DPDK_vswitchd_LDFLAGS=$(echo "$DPDK_LIB"| tr -s ' ' ',' | sed 's/-
> Wl,//g')
> >> +    # Replace -pthread with -lpthread for LD and remove the last extra
> comma.
> >> +    DPDK_vswitchd_LDFLAGS=$(echo "$DPDK_vswitchd_LDFLAGS"| sed
> 's/,$//' |
> >> \
> >> +                            sed 's/-pthread/-lpthread/g')
> >> +    # Prepend "-Wl,".
> >> +    DPDK_vswitchd_LDFLAGS="-Wl,$DPDK_vswitchd_LDFLAGS"
> >> +
> >>      AC_SUBST([DPDK_vswitchd_LDFLAGS])
> >>      AC_DEFINE([DPDK_NETDEV], [1], [System uses the DPDK module.])
> >>    fi
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to