On 12/16/20 5:31 PM, Stokes, Ian wrote:
>> On 12/16/20 2:00 PM, Stokes, Ian wrote:
>>>> From: Ian Stokes <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for working and sending this Sunil.
>>>
>>> @Ilya, does this resolve your concerns WRT the pkg-config check and ARM
>> build in travis?
>>
>> It works fine.  GHA passed and Travis for Arm works fine too.
>> Some small coments inline.
> 
> Thanks for checking.
> 
>>
>> <sinp>
>>
>>>> diff --git a/acinclude.m4 b/acinclude.m4
>>>> index ddf4b71e1..eb0496c25 100644
>>>> --- a/acinclude.m4
>>>> +++ b/acinclude.m4
>>>> @@ -334,8 +334,9 @@ dnl
>>>>  dnl Configure DPDK source tree
>>>>  AC_DEFUN([OVS_CHECK_DPDK], [
>>>>    AC_ARG_WITH([dpdk],
>>>> -              [AC_HELP_STRING([--with-dpdk=/path/to/dpdk],
>>>> -                              [Specify the DPDK build directory])],
>>>> +              [AC_HELP_STRING([--with-dpdk=static|shared|yes],
>>>> +                              [Specify "static" or "shared" depending on 
>>>> the
>>>> +                              DPDK libraries to use])],
>>>>                [have_dpdk=true])
>>>>
>>>>    AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether dpdk is enabled])
>>>> @@ -345,35 +346,45 @@ AC_DEFUN([OVS_CHECK_DPDK], [
>>>>    else
>>>>      AC_MSG_RESULT([yes])
>>>>      case "$with_dpdk" in
>>>> -      yes)
>>>> -        DPDK_AUTO_DISCOVER="true"
>>>> -        PKG_CHECK_MODULES_STATIC([DPDK], [libdpdk], [
>>>> -            DPDK_INCLUDE="$DPDK_CFLAGS"
>>>> -            DPDK_LIB="$DPDK_LIBS"], [
>>>> -            DPDK_INCLUDE="-I/usr/local/include/dpdk -I/usr/include/dpdk"
>>>> -            DPDK_LIB="-ldpdk"])
>>>> -        ;;
>>>> -      *)
>>>> -        DPDK_AUTO_DISCOVER="false"
>>>> -        DPDK_INCLUDE_PATH="$with_dpdk/include"
>>>> -        # If 'with_dpdk' is passed install directory, point to headers
>>>> -        # installed in $DESTDIR/$prefix/include/dpdk
>>>> -        if test -e "$DPDK_INCLUDE_PATH/rte_config.h"; then
>>>> -           DPDK_INCLUDE="-I$DPDK_INCLUDE_PATH"
>>>> -        elif test -e "$DPDK_INCLUDE_PATH/dpdk/rte_config.h"; then
>>>> -           DPDK_INCLUDE="-I$DPDK_INCLUDE_PATH/dpdk"
>>>> -        fi
>>>> -        DPDK_LIB_DIR="$with_dpdk/lib"
>>>> -        DPDK_LIB="-ldpdk"
>>>> -        ;;
>>>> +      "shared")
>>>> +          PKG_CHECK_MODULES([DPDK], [libdpdk], [
>>>> +              DPDK_INCLUDE="$DPDK_CFLAGS"
>>>> +              DPDK_LIB="$DPDK_LIBS"], [
>>>> +              DPDK_INCLUDE="-I/usr/local/include/dpdk -I/usr/include/dpdk"
>>>> +              DPDK_LIB="-ldpdk"])
>>>> +              ;;
>>>> +      "static" | "yes")
>>>> +          PKG_CHECK_MODULES_STATIC([DPDK], [libdpdk], [
>>>> +              DPDK_INCLUDE="$DPDK_CFLAGS"
>>>> +              DPDK_LIB="$DPDK_LIBS"], [
>>>> +              DPDK_INCLUDE="-I/usr/local/include/dpdk -I/usr/include/dpdk"
>>>> +              DPDK_LIB="-ldpdk"])
>>>> +
>>>> +          dnl Statically linked private DPDK objects of form
>>>> +          dnl -l:file.a must be positioned between
>>>> +          dnl --whole-archive ... --no-whole-archive linker parameters.
>>>> +          dnl Old pkg-config versions misplace --no-whole-archive 
>>>> parameter
>>>> +          dnl and put it next to --whole-archive.
>>>> +          AC_MSG_CHECKING([for faulty pkg-config version])
>>>> +          echo "$DPDK_LIB" | grep -q 
>>>> 'whole-archive.*l:lib.*no-whole-archive'
>>>> +          status=$?
>>>> +          case $status in
>>>> +            0)
>>>> +              AC_MSG_RESULT([no])
>>>> +              ;;
>>>> +            1)
>>>> +            AC_MSG_RESULT([yes])
>>>> +            AC_MSG_ERROR([Please upgrade.pkg-config])
>>
>> Indentation of above lines is a bit off.  And the text is a bit strange to 
>> me.
>> Why is there a period in the middle of sentence?
>>
> 
> Agreed, can remove this period and align correctly.
> 
>>>> +              ;;
>>>> +            *)
>>>> +              AC_MSG_ERROR([grep exited with status $status])
>>>> +              ;;
>>>> +          esac
>>>>      esac
>>>>
>>>>      ovs_save_CFLAGS="$CFLAGS"
>>>>      ovs_save_LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS"
>>>>      CFLAGS="$CFLAGS $DPDK_INCLUDE"
>>>> -    if test "$DPDK_AUTO_DISCOVER" = "false"; then
>>>> -      LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -L${DPDK_LIB_DIR}"
>>>> -    fi
>>>>
>>>>      AC_CHECK_HEADERS([rte_config.h], [], [
>>>>        AC_MSG_ERROR([unable to find rte_config.h in $with_dpdk])
>>>> @@ -422,20 +433,18 @@ AC_DEFUN([OVS_CHECK_DPDK], [
>>>>        [AC_MSG_RESULT([yes])
>>>>         DPDKLIB_FOUND=true],
>>>>        [AC_MSG_RESULT([no])
>>>> -       if test "$DPDK_AUTO_DISCOVER" = "true"; then
>>>> -         AC_MSG_ERROR(m4_normalize([
>>>> -            Could not find DPDK library in default search path, Use 
>>>> --with-dpdk
>>>> -            to specify the DPDK library installed in non-standard 
>>>> location]))
>>>> -       else
>>>> -         AC_MSG_ERROR([Could not find DPDK libraries in $DPDK_LIB_DIR])
>>>> -       fi
>>>> +       AC_MSG_ERROR(m4_normalize([
>>>> +          Could not find DPDK library in default search path, update
>>>> +          PKG_CONFIG_PATH for pkg-config to find the .pc file in
>>>> +          non-standard location]))
>>>>        ])
>>>>
>>>>      CFLAGS="$ovs_save_CFLAGS"
>>>>      LDFLAGS="$ovs_save_LDFLAGS"
>>>> -    if test "$DPDK_AUTO_DISCOVER" = "false"; then
>>>> -      OVS_LDFLAGS="$OVS_LDFLAGS -L$DPDK_LIB_DIR"
>>>> -    fi
>>>> +    # Stripping out possible instruction set specific configuration that 
>>>> DPDK
>>>> +    # forces in pkg-config since this could override user-specified 
>>>> options.
>>>> +    # It's enough to have -mssse3 to build with DPDK headers.
>>>> +    DPDK_INCLUDE=$(echo "$DPDK_INCLUDE" | sed 's/-march=[[^ ]]*//g')
>>>>      OVS_CFLAGS="$OVS_CFLAGS $DPDK_INCLUDE"
>>>>      OVS_ENABLE_OPTION([-mssse3])
>>>>
>>>> @@ -444,17 +453,16 @@ AC_DEFUN([OVS_CHECK_DPDK], [
>>>>      # This happens because the rest of the DPDK code doesn't use any 
>>>> symbol
>> in
>>>>      # the pmd driver objects, and the drivers register themselves using an
>>>>      # __attribute__((constructor)) function.
>>>> -    #
>>>> -    # These options are specified inside a single -Wl directive to prevent
>>>> -    # autotools from reordering them.
>>>> -    #
>>>> -    # OTOH newer versions of dpdk pkg-config (generated with Meson)
>>>> -    # will already have flagged just the right set of libs with
>>>> -    # --whole-archive - in those cases do not wrap it once more.
>>>> -    case "$DPDK_LIB" in
>>>> -      *whole-archive*) DPDK_vswitchd_LDFLAGS=$DPDK_LIB;;
>>>> -      *) DPDK_vswitchd_LDFLAGS=-Wl,--whole-archive,$DPDK_LIB,--no-
>> whole-
>>>> archive
>>>> -    esac
>>>> +
>>
>> This empty line divides a comment into 2 separate comments.  With that, first
>> part of a comment looks like it's not related to the second one.
>> I think, it should be a single comment block, otherwise, it's unclear why 
>> we're
>> talking about 'whole-archive' stuff there at all.
>>
> 
> OK, we can move this back to one comment.
> 
> With these changes are you happy for me to commit with your ack?

Yes, I'm OK with that.

> 
> Regards
> Ian
>>>> +    # Wrap the DPDK libraries inside a single -Wl directive
>>>> +    # after comma separation to prevent autotools from reordering them.
>>>> +    DPDK_vswitchd_LDFLAGS=$(echo "$DPDK_LIB"| tr -s ' ' ',' | sed 's/-
>> Wl,//g')
>>>> +    # Replace -pthread with -lpthread for LD and remove the last extra
>> comma.
>>>> +    DPDK_vswitchd_LDFLAGS=$(echo "$DPDK_vswitchd_LDFLAGS"| sed
>> 's/,$//' |
>>>> \
>>>> +                            sed 's/-pthread/-lpthread/g')
>>>> +    # Prepend "-Wl,".
>>>> +    DPDK_vswitchd_LDFLAGS="-Wl,$DPDK_vswitchd_LDFLAGS"
>>>> +
>>>>      AC_SUBST([DPDK_vswitchd_LDFLAGS])
>>>>      AC_DEFINE([DPDK_NETDEV], [1], [System uses the DPDK module.])
>>>>    fi

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to