Hi Ben, * Yes, definitely. C11/C17 stdatomic.h is high on the list. * Our current critical path item for MSVC DPDK support is TLS.
Hi Thomas, * I will setup some time next week to discuss alignment and share our proposed MSVC plan. From: Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, November 4, 2021 11:15 AM To: Omar Cardona <[email protected]> Cc: William Tu <[email protected]>; thomas <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> <[email protected]>; ovs-dev <[email protected]>; Sergey Madaminov <[email protected]>; Kadam, Pallavi <[email protected]>; Ilya Maximets <[email protected]>; Test <[email protected]>; Dmitry Kozlyuk <[email protected]>; talshn <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] RFC: netdev-dpdk: Add Windows support. On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 8:37 AM Omar Cardona <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > f. With clang support on Windows, can we remove MSVC? Please no. We are actively working with the MSVC team to extend support for DPDKs dependencies Could you get them to implement C11 atomics? The MSVC support for atomic operations is poor, unless it's changed since I last looked. We could remove quite a bit of rather awful stuff if either MSVC supported the C standard or if OVS dropped support for MSVC. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
