The <stdatomic.h> news is good, thanks! On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 12:09 PM Omar Cardona <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi *Ben,* > > - Yes, definitely. C11/C17 stdatomic.h is high on the list. > - Our current critical path item for MSVC DPDK support is TLS. > > > > Hi *Thomas,* > > - I will setup some time next week to discuss alignment and share our > proposed MSVC plan. > > > > > > *From:* Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Thursday, November 4, 2021 11:15 AM > *To:* Omar Cardona <[email protected]> > *Cc:* William Tu <[email protected]>; thomas <[email protected]>; < > [email protected]> <[email protected]>; ovs-dev < > [email protected]>; Sergey Madaminov <[email protected]>; > Kadam, Pallavi <[email protected]>; Ilya Maximets < > [email protected]>; Test <[email protected]>; Dmitry Kozlyuk < > [email protected]>; talshn <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] RFC: netdev-dpdk: Add > Windows support. > > > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 8:37 AM Omar Cardona <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > f. With clang support on Windows, can we remove MSVC? > > Please no. We are actively working with the MSVC team to extend support > for DPDKs dependencies > > > > Could you get them to implement C11 atomics? The MSVC support for atomic > > operations is poor, unless it's changed since I last looked. We could > remove > > quite a bit of rather awful stuff if either MSVC supported the C standard > or if > > OVS dropped support for MSVC. > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
