On 09/12/2021 15:21, Ian Stokes wrote:
This commit adds support for DPDK v21.11, it includes the following
changes.
1. ci: Install python elftools for DPDK 21.02.
2. ci: Update meson requirement for DPDK 21.05.
3. netdev-dpdk: Fix build with 21.05.
4. ci: Compile DPDK in non developer mode.
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/list/?series=242480&state=*
5. netdev-dpdk: Remove access to DPDK internals.
6. netdev-dpdk: Remove unused attribute from rte_flow rule.
7. netdev-dpdk: Fix mbuf macros namespace with 21.11-rc1.
8. netdev-dpdk: Fix vhost namespace with 21.11-rc2.
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/list/?series=271040&state=*
There was a v3, so it should be:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/list/?series=271159&state=*
In addition documentaion and DPDK unit tests were also updated in this
commit for use with DPDK v21.11.
typo, documentation
For credit all authors of the original commits to 'dpdk-latest' with the above
changes have been added as co-authors for this commit.
Signed-off-by: David Marchand<david.march...@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: David Marchand<david.march...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin<maxime.coque...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ian Stokes<ian.sto...@intel.com>
There's no tested-by or mention of testing above. I didn't see it in the
email threads either. Maybe that can be mentioned in the commit message
to confirm it was done.
---
Just a few nits in the commit message that can be fixed on applying.
Otherwise assuming it went through Intel OVS ci, the patches lgtm
(though i didn't review the ethdev internals one in detail). Built and
ran a basic test to move some pkts, no issue.
btw, having links to the relevant DPDK commits in the ovs commit logs is
really helpful for cross referencing, we should keep doing that. David++.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
