On 31 Aug 2022, at 12:25, Ilya Maximets wrote:

> If tnl_port_should_receive() is false, we're looking for a normal
> port, not a tunnel one.  And it's better to print recirculation IDs
> in hex since they are typically printed this way in flow dumps.
>
> Fixes: d40533fc820c ("odp-util: Improve log messages and error reporting for 
> Netlink parsing.")
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <[email protected]>

Changes look good to me with one small nit below. Compile and make check tested.

Acked-by: Eelco Chaudron <[email protected]>

//Eelco

> ---
>  ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c |  4 ++--
>  tests/ofproto-dpif.at        | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c
> index fda802e83..5c3021765 100644
> --- a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c
> +++ b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c
> @@ -1515,7 +1515,7 @@ xlate_lookup_ofproto_(const struct dpif_backer *backer,
>          if (OVS_UNLIKELY(!recirc_id_node)) {
>              if (errorp) {
>                  *errorp = xasprintf("no recirculation data for recirc_id "
> -                                    "%"PRIu32, flow->recirc_id);
> +                                    "%#"PRIx32, flow->recirc_id);
>              }
>              return NULL;
>          }
> @@ -1556,7 +1556,7 @@ xlate_lookup_ofproto_(const struct dpif_backer *backer,
>          if (errorp) {
>              *errorp = (tnl_port_should_receive(flow)
>                         ? xstrdup("no OpenFlow tunnel port for this packet")
> -                       : xasprintf("no OpenFlow tunnel port for datapath "
> +                       : xasprintf("no OpenFlow port for datapath "
>                                     "port %"PRIu32, flow->in_port.odp_port));

nit: should we move port to the previous line now that we have room, it makes 
grep for strings easier?

Something like:

+                       : xasprintf("no OpenFlow port for datapath port %"
+                                   PRIu32, flow->in_port.odp_port));

>          }
>          return NULL;
> diff --git a/tests/ofproto-dpif.at b/tests/ofproto-dpif.at
> index 2e91ae1a1..f32a16981 100644
> --- a/tests/ofproto-dpif.at
> +++ b/tests/ofproto-dpif.at
> @@ -6393,6 +6393,20 @@ AT_CHECK([tail -2 stderr], [0], [dnl
>  ovs-appctl: ovs-vswitchd: server returned an error
>  ])
>
> +# Test incorrect command: ofproto/trace with nonexistent port number
> +AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl ofproto/trace ovs-dummy "in_port(42)" ], [2], [stdout], 
> [stderr])
> +AT_CHECK([tail -2 stderr], [0], [dnl
> +no OpenFlow port for datapath port 42
> +ovs-appctl: ovs-vswitchd: server returned an error
> +])
> +
> +# Test incorrect command: ofproto/trace with nonexistent recirc_id
> +AT_CHECK([ovs-appctl ofproto/trace ovs-dummy "recirc_id(0x42)" ], [2], 
> [stdout], [stderr])
> +AT_CHECK([tail -2 stderr], [0], [dnl
> +no recirculation data for recirc_id 0x42
> +ovs-appctl: ovs-vswitchd: server returned an error
> +])
> +
>  OVS_VSWITCHD_STOP
>  AT_CLEANUP
>
> -- 
> 2.34.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to