On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 3:56 AM Tianyu Yuan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Jamal, > > > When no action is specified, there should not be gact with PIPE, rather than > a gact with drop, like: >
Thanks for the example dumps. I think you should put them in your commit logs. [..] > > About the second scenario of PIPE alone, I don’t think it should exist. > Besides this adding a PIPE at the first place of a tc filter to update the > flow stats, another > attempt that directly store the flower stats, which is got from driver, in > socket transacted > with userspace (e.g. OVS). In this approach, we don’t have to make changes in > driver. Which > could be a better solution you think for this propose I was thinking about a case of a filter with no actions but with interest in a counter for that match. i.e pseudo-tc-dsl as: tc filter add ... flower blah action count which translated is: tc filter add ... flower blah action pipe cheers, jamal _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
