> On 12/5/22 22:31, Ian Stokes wrote:
> > This commit add support to for DPDK v22.11.1, it includes the following
> > changes.
> >
> > 1. ci: Reduce DPDK compilation time.
> > 2. system-dpdk: Update vhost tests to be compatible with DPDK 22.07.
> >
> >    http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/list/?series=316528
> >
> > 3. system-dpdk: Update vhost tests to be compatible with DPDK 22.07.
> >
> >    http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/list/?series=311332
> >
> > 4. netdev-dpdk: Report device bus specific information.
> > 5. netdev-dpdk: Drop reference to Rx header split.
> >
> >    http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/list/?series=321808
> >
> > In addition documentation was also updated in this commit for use with
> > DPDK v22.11.1.
> >
> > The Debian shared DPDK compilation test is removed as part of this patch
> > due to a packaging requirement. Once DPDK v22.11.1 is available in Debian
> > repositories it should be re-enabled in OVS.
> >
> > For credit all authors of the original commits to 'dpdk-latest' with the
> > above changes have been added as co-authors for this commit
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Marchand <[email protected]>
> > Co-authored-by: David Marchand <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Sunil Pai G <[email protected]>
> > Co-authored-by: Sunil Pai G <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Stokes <[email protected]>
> >
> > ---
> > v3 -> v4
> > * Rebase to master.
> > * Update to use DPDK v22.11.1
> > * Update missed documentation mentioned by David.
> > * Remove Debian shared DPDK test in test matrix.
> >
> > v2 -> v3
> > * Remove RFC status.
> > * Update debian control to use 22.11.
> >
> > v1 -> v2
> > * Updated to use DPDK 22.11 rc4.
> >
> > * Please Note: Although DPDK documentation has been updated in this patch
> > the resource has not been updated on the DPDK site as of yet, this will
> > be expected as part of DPDK 22.11 final release.
> >
> > * The GitHub actions 'linux deb shared dpdk' is expected to fail with this
> > patch as DPDK 22.11 is not part of the package structure yet.
> > ---
> >  .ci/linux-build.sh                       |  7 ++-
> >  .github/workflows/build-and-test.yml     |  1 -
> >  Documentation/faq/releases.rst           |  2 +-
> >  Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst     | 16 +++----
> >  Documentation/topics/dpdk/phy.rst        |  8 ++--
> >  Documentation/topics/dpdk/vdev.rst       |  2 +-
> >  Documentation/topics/dpdk/vhost-user.rst |  2 +-
> >  Documentation/topics/testing.rst         |  2 +-
> >  Documentation/topics/userspace-tso.rst   |  2 +-
> >  NEWS                                     | 18 +-------
> >  debian/control.in                        |  2 +-
> >  lib/netdev-dpdk.c                        | 24 ++++------
> >  rhel/openvswitch-fedora.spec.in          |  2 +-
> >  tests/system-dpdk.at                     | 78 
> > ++++++++++++++++----------------
> >  14 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
> >
> 
> I'll leave the actual review to David and others, but at the
> glance the change looks fine.
> 
> There is some problem with Intel CI, it looks like it is trying
> to apply the patch on outdated tree, hence the conflict in NEWS
> even though NEWS didn't change since the last week.
> Michael, could you check?

I spotted this as  well and flagged to Michael, looks like the Intel CI branch 
was out of date but once updated it applied  and Michael is re-running the 
tests now.

> 
> One small nit below.
> 
> >  Enabling TSO
> >  ~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
> > index f6caf1ca7..0859f4335 100644
> > --- a/NEWS
> > +++ b/NEWS
> > @@ -9,23 +9,7 @@ Post-v3.0.0
> >     - Windows:
> >       * Conntrack IPv6 fragment support.
> >     - DPDK:
> > -     * OVS validated with DPDK 21.11.2.
> > -       DPDK 21.11.2 contains fixes for the following CVEs:
> > -       CVE-2022-28199 cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-
> 28199
> > -       CVE-2022-2132 cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-
> 2132
> > -       A bug was introduced in DPDK 21.11.1 by the commit
> > -       01e3dee29c02 ("vhost: fix unsafe vring addresses modifications").
> > -       This bug can cause a deadlock when vIOMMU is enabled and NUMA
> > -       reallocation of the virtqueues happen.
> > -       A fix has been posted and pushed to the DPDK 21.11 branch.
> > -       It can be found here:
> > -       https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20220725203206.427083-
> [email protected]/.
> > -       If a user wishes to avoid the issue then it is recommended to use
> > -       DPDK 21.11.0 until the release of DPDK 21.11.3.
> > -       It should be noted that DPDK 21.11.0 does not benefit from the 
> > numerous
> > -       bug and CVE fixes addressed since its release.
> > -       If a user wishes to benefit from these fixes it is recommended to 
> > use
> > -       DPDK 21.11.2.
> > +       * Add support for DPDK 22.11.1.
> 
> This line is slightly overindented.  Should be shifted 2 spaces to the left.
> Can be fixed while applying the change, I guess.

Ah good catch, will fix before applying.

Thanks
Ian

> 
> >     - For the QoS max-rate and STP/RSTP path-cost configuration OVS now
> assumes
> >       10 Gbps link speed by default in case the actual link speed cannot be
> >       determined.  Previously it was 10 Mbps.  Values can still be 
> > overridden

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to